The
R102, R103 and R104 had been planned and the concept specifications
showed that they would carry up to 150 passengers. At Cardington,
the design team had already started plans for this next
generation. The R102 initially was to have a volume of 8,300,000
cubic feet which would have made it comparable to the LZ129
"Hindenburg", which was completed some 6 years
later.
Designated "Project
H", R102 had been agreed in the August of 1930 with
a capacity some 36% larger than the lengthened R101. It
was to be built at Cardington and was to be powered by seven
improved Tornado engines.
Discussions during 1929
and 1930 centred on a still larger ship of 9,500,000 cubic
feet capacity - the R103, although it was not yet designated
as such. As quoted by Sir Peter Masefield, "This ship
would be capable of regular operations with a non stop travel
to Egypt with a substantial payload. The ship would then
move on with stops at Karachi, Rangoon and Singapore to
Australia. It was expected to reach westwards to Montreal
non stop in all weathers".
However it was agreed
that Project H (R102) could carry out the same duties being
a smaller ship if additional masts were built for refueling.
Plans and land surveys were carried out at Malta and Baghdad
on the India route, and at Monkton, New Brunswick on the
Canadian route.
Due to the problems
with operating in hotter climates, it was noted that there
would be loss of lift in the months between May and August
amounting to some 8% of gross lift. This would mean that
some weight saving be made, with either reducing the amount
of reserve fuel carried, or passengers during those months.
A proposal note in a document dated 20th Match 1929 stated
that
"On
the India route, there is little doubt that for economic
reasons alone, these re-fuelling towers will be erected
at Malta, Marselles and in the vicinty of Basra and Aden
when commerical services ae being run"
The future plans also
included the lengthening of the Cardington sheds and the
building of one new shed capable of accommodating two ships
side by side. An additional mast would also have to be built
so that the R100 and R101 could run and operate services
concurrently.
What is interesting
in the doucments found, is that the R 102 was still being
planned in December 1930, some 2 months after the loss of
the R.101
|